githusb.com
EST. 2026 · 533 DEVS ANALYSED · A PUBLIC DIAGNOSTIC
Is he husband material,
or just a committer?
Paste any GitHub handle. In about 15 seconds you get a Husband Material score, a title he will hate, three strengths, three red flags, and a shareable card he cannot un-see.
TRY:@torvalds@gaearon@tj
Yours, his, your ex’s, your boss’s — any public GitHub handle works. We only read what is already on github.com. No login, no email, no “please sign up to continue”.
§ Three verified reads
This is the range.
From marriage material to “why is he like this”.
82
/100
@cassidoo
✓ VERIFIEDThe Community Curator
“Three months in, she will solve your relationship issues by closing them as 'not planned' and moving on to the next project.”
✓ WIN15,791 stars across 187 repos proves she builds things people actually want to use.
⚠ FLAGZero public commits in 90 days; she’s either busy shipping at GitHub or ghosting the public.
82
/100
@abbycabs
✓ VERIFIEDThe Institutional Open-Source Curator
“Mid-argument, she will calmly suggest a community-led governance model for your relationship that leaves you feeling surprisingly heard but slightly managed.”
✓ WIN15 years on GitHub; has survived enough tech cycles to know what actually lasts.
⚠ FLAGFollows 0 people; treats her social graph like a read-only production database.
78
/100
@leereilly
✓ VERIFIEDThe Night-Shift Curator
“Three months in, you will realize your evening plans are competing with his 39% night-commit ratio.”
✓ WIN16 years of consistent output; has survived every tech stack trend since 2008.
⚠ FLAG39% of commits happen after midnight; your relationship will be a background process.
§ What we actually judge
A partial list of the sins and virtues we look for.
Every number on a githusb card is grounded in real GitHub signals. We just call them by their dating-therapy names.
Commits at 3 AM on a Tuesday
— the night shift
Force-pushes to main
— emotional dysregulation
‘fix’ as a commit message
— avoidant communicator
README.md that just says ‘todo’
— can’t express feelings
TODO comments older than his driver’s license
— fear of commitment
Closes issues with ‘nvm’
— dismissive attachment
47 stars, 2 merged PRs
— chronic idealist
Hasn’t reviewed a PR since 2023
— not emotionally available
Wrote a CONTRIBUTING.md
— considers shared labor
Answers his @-mentions within 6 hours
— responsive partner
Replies to issues with mercy
— high emotional IQ
Tests, even the boring ones
— long-term thinker
And about twenty more we don’t want to give away before you try it.
§ Questions you already had
Frequently dodged.
Is this real?
The signals are real. The dating advice is mostly emotional damage.
Will he know I analyzed him?
Not unless you tell him. Or share the card. Both are strongly encouraged.
Can I analyze myself?
Yes. It is the second most-searched use case after “my ex”.
Does a high score mean he’s the one?
It means he reviews PRs. Correlation with marriage fidelity has not been formally established.
How accurate is it?
About as accurate as reading someone’s texts from 2014. Directionally useful, occasionally devastating.
Why is my crush’s score so low?
Because he pushes to main with ‘wip’ and has no tests.
§ Your turn
So. Whose GitHub are you about to scroll through?
No judgment. Just paste the handle.
TRY:@torvalds@gaearon@tj